The Idaho Falls School District is embroiled in two court battles following a failed $250 million bond issue last November. This unsuccessful bond initiative has highlighted tensions between school leaders and taxpayers and raised questions about the responsible use of public funds.
A significant challenge stemmed from allegations that then-Superintendent James Shank and district spokesperson Margaret Wimborne had inappropriately utilized public funds to promote the bond. Bonneville County Prosecutor, Randy Neal, charged them, leading to a potential fine of $375 to settle the matter. Rather than settling, the district opted for a costly legal defense, incurring significant attorney fees. This decision has been criticized for burdening taxpayers further.
Superintendent Karla LaOrange, who replaced Shank, defended the decision not to settle. She emphasized the move was about “what’s right and wrong” and not about the fines. LaOrange accused the prosecutor’s office of inappropriate action, stating that concerns should’ve been raised promptly and questioning the extensive resources dedicated to this case.
Additionally, after the failed bond, Idaho Falls passed a $33 million plant facilities levy to fund a new elementary school. Despite achieving approval from nearly 70% of the voters, the levy was declared invalid by the Tax Commission. Neal suggests that the district should re-present the measure as a bond in the November ballot. Contrarily, LaOrange expressed that such a move could confuse voters and goes against their mandate.
In both these legal matters, LaOrange stressed the trustees’ “courage and conviction” and their commitment to doing what they believe is best for students. The ongoing legal confrontations underscore the complexities of school funding and the potential fallout when transparency and trust issues arise between school officials and the public they serve.
Read the full article on Idaho Ed News